Top Tens – TV: Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series (8) Fantasy: Sweet Home

Netflix promotional poster art

 

 

(8) FANTASY: SWEET HOME

(2020 – 2024: SEASONS 1-3)

 

Monster apocalypse!

Adapted from a webtoon, apocalyptic horror hits South Korea, as people turn into monsters inside and outside an apartment building – with the second and third season expanding the setting from the original building, as well as featuring the remnants of the army and government studying the monsters in hope of finding a cure.

It’s distinct from a zombie apocalypse – as while the transformations have symptoms of onset, the transformations themselves are not contagious and don’t have the qualities of viral infection of your standard zombie apocalypse. Also, the monster transformations are metaphysical or even karmic in nature, usually reflecting some character trait in the person being transformed. Hence, some monsters are more monstrous than others, in appearance or in morality.

I mean, the first episode sets the tone with the series protagonist hears his neighbor complaining she’s hungry as she eats his ramen (ransacked from the package delivery outside his door) – and her cat.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Unlike a zombie apocalypse which usually is more SF than fantasy, the monster apocalypse is a little too metaphysical for SF and so I’ve ranked it as fantasy. However, it still retains some SF trappings, for being set in the contemporary world with the government or military trying to study the monsters for a possible cure.

 

HORROR

 

What part of monster apocalypse did you miss? You can pretty much rank it as straight-up horror.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

Top Tens – Film: Top 10 Fantasy & SF Films: (8) SF: Back to the Future

Classic promotional poster art for the first film

 

 

(8) SF: BACK TO THE FUTURE

(1985-1990: BACK TO THE FUTURE 1-3)

 

“If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you’re gonna see some serious sh*t.”

Alternatively, “McFly!”

One of the two definitive SF time travel franchises of all time – as per South Park, “Terminator rules” are that time travel is “one way only and you can’t go back”, in contrast with “Back to the Future rules, where back and forth is possible”. The other distinction is the mutability of time in the latter as opposed to the former – or to put it simply, you can change the past in the latter, for better or worse. Which in my opinion makes for the more entertaining franchise for the actual time travel – combining “fish out of water comedy with high-stakes drama, making deft use of threatened temporal paradox” (not to mention running gags based on similar events across time) and shuttling back and forth 30 years before and after 1985 as well as a century into the past.

The first film in the trilogy is the best, setting the basic themes and tropes for the sequels to follow:

“Marty McFly, a teenager from 1985, accidentally sends himself to 1955 in the time machine Doc Brown built out of a DeLorean, and requires 1.21 gigawatts of power to return home. After initial confusion, the 1955 Doc Brown agrees to help Marty get back home by striking his car with 1.21 gigawatts of lightning, giving Marty a week to make his parents fall back in love at a dance and put bully Biff Tannen in his place”

Not to mention inventing rock ‘n’ roll…

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Again, it’s obviously SF – one of the definitive SF time travel film franchises! Although time travel can work as a fantasy trope – and I do like it whenever it pops up in fantasy, although it is perhaps more limited in fantasy use because of its potential story-breaking power if done by means of magic controlled by a character or protagonist.

 

HORROR

 

Unusually for fantasy or SF, virtually no element of horror – unless you count the existential horror of erasing yourself from existence by changing the past….

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – History (WW2): Top 10 Second World Wars (Special Mention) (6) Demographic War – Deportation, Displacement & Expulsions

German language areas in Poland, Czechia, Kaliningrad Oblast (Russia – formerly East Prussia), and Lithuania before expulsion of Germans (with green as completely German and yellow as ethnically mixed areas) – public domain image

 

 

(6) DEMOGRAPHIC WAR –

DEPORTATION, DISPLACEMENT & EXPULSIONS

(1939-1948)

 

“The Second World War caused the movement of the largest number of people in the shortest period of time in history.”

Of course, much of this movement was what might be described as ‘conventional’ refugees, caused by or fleeing from hostilities, from the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 onwards.

However, much of it was what might be described as demographic war – “mass evacuation, forced displacement, expulsion, and deportation of millions of people…enforced by the former Axis and the Allied powers…Belligerents on both sides engaged in forms of expulsion of people perceived as being associated with the enemy”.

Or just simply the enemy, targeted in a form of demographic warfare or in modern parlance, ethnic cleansing. We’ve already looked at the best known example of this in my special mention for the Holocaust – a primary component of which was the deportation of the Jewish population within Europe, as the preliminary step to something more…final.

That also illustrates the major location for demographic warfare was central and eastern Europe. The movement of people in more targeted expulsions than as refugees commenced with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 – on both sides of the line of Nazi and Soviet occupation. Both the Germans and Soviets expelled Poles in similar numbers – with the Germans expelling more 1.6 to 2 million Poles, not including “millions of slave laborers deported from Poland to the Reich”, while the Soviets expelled over 1.5 million Poles.

The Soviets were then the leaders in expulsions, either to secure the territory secured under the Nazi-Soviet Pact – Finns, Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians – or as ‘defensive’ measures against ethnic populations potentially aligned with the Germans. The latter involved the Soviets deporting ethnic populations from European Russia to Siberia, Central Asia or more remote areas of the Soviet Union – perhaps most famously the Volga Germans and Crimean Tartars, but also “Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays and Meskehtian Turks”. Many of these were in 1943-1944, arguably  well after the time of any ‘defensive’ emergency had passed.

The United States infamously had its own version of internal deportation with the internment of Japanese-Americans.

Elsewhere the Balkans was the scene of ongoing demographic warfare or outright ethnic cleansing, most well known of which was that of the Serbs from Croatia and Bosnia in Axis-occupied Yugoslavia.

However, one of the largest but still least well known expulsions came at the end and in the aftermath of the Second World War in Europe – the flight and expulsion of Germans from central and eastern Europe, either of Germany minority populations from other countries, now seen as the vanguard or at least casus belli of German aggression against those countries, or Germans from former German territory now ceded to other states, notably East Prussia to the Soviet Union and other eastern German territory to Poland.

“Between 13.5 and 16.5 million German-speakers fled, were evacuated or later expelled from Central and Eastern Europe”. The primary parties responsible for the post-war expulsions were of the new governments of the central or eastern European states formerly occupied by or allied to Germany – and behind them of course Stalin’s Soviet Union – but the western Allies had agreed in principle to such expulsions provided they were carried out in a way that was “orderly and humane”.

Sadly, they were not – with estimates of the number of those who died during or from them ranging from half a million to two or even three million.

While the western Allies played no active part in the post-war expulsion of Germans, except of course to receive them as refugees in their occupation zones in West Germany or Austria, they did notoriously play an active role in the postwar repatriation of Russian Cossacks taken as prisoners of war to a grim fate in the Soviet Union.

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – Mythology: Top 10 Books (Special Mention: Subject) (1) Bible & Biblical Mythology

Harper Perennial edition 1983

 

 

(1) BIBLE & BIBLICAL MYTHOLOGY:

MANFRED BARTHEL – WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY SAYS (1982)

 

Genesis and apocalypse, alpha and omega, allelujah and amen!

Of course, the Bible itself is my primary book on this subject, with it and biblical mythology each in top spot in my Top 10 Mythology Books and Top 10 Mythologies respectively. It’s helped into top spot in that for many people it is not just mythology but religion – hence I take a broad view of this subject to extend to Jewish or Christian folklore such as angels and saints.

The most prominent Biblical figure in my reading – reflecting the prolific number of books on him – would be Jesus, particularly with analysis or studies of what is often termed the historical Jesus (as opposed to the mythic or religious Christ), hence a few of my honorable mentions here. On the other hand, my personal favorite book of the Bible is the Book of Apocalypse, or as I like to call it, Babylon and the Beast – hence my special mention for Jonathan Kirsch, who wrote about it in A History of the End of the World.

It doesn’t stop there. As I like to quip, it’s the book that doesn’t stop giving, even after you stop believing – but also with respect to reading other books, including other entries in my Top 10 Mythology Books or special mentions. Specifically, there’s the aforementioned special mention for Jonathan Kirsch, with his books on biblical subjects other than The Book of Apocalypse – primarily the Old Testament but also manifestations of religious belief within Christianity. More generally, there’s my top ten entries for Barbara Walker’s The Women’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets as well as the Penguin Dictionary of Symbols, each of which has a substantial number of their encyclopedia or dictionary entries on Biblical subjects or broader subjects within Jewish or Christian folklore.

However, the keynote book I’ve selected for this special mention for books on the Bible or biblical mythology is Manfred Barthel’s What the Bible Really Says. The book is summed up in its subtitle, “casting new light on the book of books” – or as per the longer blurb or precis this edition (which is the one I have) has on its front cover for some reason, “fascinating archaeological discoveries and surprising new translations are enriching our understanding of what the Bible really says. Here readers of all religious persuasions will find fresh insights to illuminate and make the Bible more meaningful and exciting reading”.

Given the book was published in 1982, that light is not so new anymore but it remains highly, well, illuminating. I’m not so sure about that “readers of all religious persuasions”, or that “exciting reading” for that matter – as I like to quip, the Bible may be the Word of God but in that case He needed a good editor. Barthel is forthright from the outset that any serious study of the Bible has to abandon any notions of fundamentalism or literalism – that the Bible is literally true in every aspect. However, those inclined to skepticism towards any historicity in the Bible may find their views challenged equally.

What the Bible Really Says is the source of my hot take about the Bible, to antagonize both believers and skeptics – that the Bible is a lot less historical than fundamentalist believers usually maintain, but more historical than skeptics usually give it credit.

Among other things, it proposes more naturalistic explanations of apparently supernatural miracles. For example, it queries that people have proposed all sorts of different explanations, allegorical or otherwise, for the burning bush, until only recently thinking to ask a botanist whether there was a plant capable of matching that description. And indeed there is – a species of plant that accumulates an oil on its leaves, which can then ignite in the sun and burn off, harmlessly without affecting the leaf or plant.

And so on – with little interpretative nuggets like that throughout the book, literally from genesis to apocalypse.

 

RATING: 5 STARS*****

S-TIER (GOD TIER – WHAT ELSE?)