Top Tens – TV: Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series (8) Fantasy: Sweet Home

Netflix promotional poster art

 

 

(8) FANTASY: SWEET HOME

(2020 – 2024: SEASONS 1-3)

 

Monster apocalypse!

Adapted from a webtoon, apocalyptic horror hits South Korea, as people turn into monsters inside and outside an apartment building – with the second and third season expanding the setting from the original building, as well as featuring the remnants of the army and government studying the monsters in hope of finding a cure.

It’s distinct from a zombie apocalypse – as while the transformations have symptoms of onset, the transformations themselves are not contagious and don’t have the qualities of viral infection of your standard zombie apocalypse. Also, the monster transformations are metaphysical or even karmic in nature, usually reflecting some character trait in the person being transformed. Hence, some monsters are more monstrous than others, in appearance or in morality.

I mean, the first episode sets the tone with the series protagonist hears his neighbor complaining she’s hungry as she eats his ramen (ransacked from the package delivery outside his door) – and her cat.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Unlike a zombie apocalypse which usually is more SF than fantasy, the monster apocalypse is a little too metaphysical for SF and so I’ve ranked it as fantasy. However, it still retains some SF trappings, for being set in the contemporary world with the government or military trying to study the monsters for a possible cure.

 

HORROR

 

What part of monster apocalypse did you miss? You can pretty much rank it as straight-up horror.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

Top Tens – Film: Top 10 Fantasy & SF Films: (8) SF: Back to the Future

Classic promotional poster art for the first film

 

 

(8) SF: BACK TO THE FUTURE

(1985-1990: BACK TO THE FUTURE 1-3)

 

“If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you’re gonna see some serious sh*t.”

Alternatively, “McFly!”

One of the two definitive SF time travel franchises of all time – as per South Park, “Terminator rules” are that time travel is “one way only and you can’t go back”, in contrast with “Back to the Future rules, where back and forth is possible”. The other distinction is the mutability of time in the latter as opposed to the former – or to put it simply, you can change the past in the latter, for better or worse. Which in my opinion makes for the more entertaining franchise for the actual time travel – combining “fish out of water comedy with high-stakes drama, making deft use of threatened temporal paradox” (not to mention running gags based on similar events across time) and shuttling back and forth 30 years before and after 1985 as well as a century into the past.

The first film in the trilogy is the best, setting the basic themes and tropes for the sequels to follow:

“Marty McFly, a teenager from 1985, accidentally sends himself to 1955 in the time machine Doc Brown built out of a DeLorean, and requires 1.21 gigawatts of power to return home. After initial confusion, the 1955 Doc Brown agrees to help Marty get back home by striking his car with 1.21 gigawatts of lightning, giving Marty a week to make his parents fall back in love at a dance and put bully Biff Tannen in his place”

Not to mention inventing rock ‘n’ roll…

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Again, it’s obviously SF – one of the definitive SF time travel film franchises! Although time travel can work as a fantasy trope – and I do like it whenever it pops up in fantasy, although it is perhaps more limited in fantasy use because of its potential story-breaking power if done by means of magic controlled by a character or protagonist.

 

HORROR

 

Unusually for fantasy or SF, virtually no element of horror – unless you count the existential horror of erasing yourself from existence by changing the past….

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – History (WW2): Top 10 Second World Wars (Special Mention) (6) Demographic War – Deportation, Displacement & Expulsions

German language areas in Poland, Czechia, Kaliningrad Oblast (Russia – formerly East Prussia), and Lithuania before expulsion of Germans (with green as completely German and yellow as ethnically mixed areas) – public domain image

 

 

(6) DEMOGRAPHIC WAR –

DEPORTATION, DISPLACEMENT & EXPULSIONS

(1939-1948)

 

“The Second World War caused the movement of the largest number of people in the shortest period of time in history.”

Of course, much of this movement was what might be described as ‘conventional’ refugees, caused by or fleeing from hostilities, from the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 onwards.

However, much of it was what might be described as demographic war – “mass evacuation, forced displacement, expulsion, and deportation of millions of people…enforced by the former Axis and the Allied powers…Belligerents on both sides engaged in forms of expulsion of people perceived as being associated with the enemy”.

Or just simply the enemy, targeted in a form of demographic warfare or in modern parlance, ethnic cleansing. We’ve already looked at the best known example of this in my special mention for the Holocaust – a primary component of which was the deportation of the Jewish population within Europe, as the preliminary step to something more…final.

That also illustrates the major location for demographic warfare was central and eastern Europe. The movement of people in more targeted expulsions than as refugees commenced with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 – on both sides of the line of Nazi and Soviet occupation. Both the Germans and Soviets expelled Poles in similar numbers – with the Germans expelling more 1.6 to 2 million Poles, not including “millions of slave laborers deported from Poland to the Reich”, while the Soviets expelled over 1.5 million Poles.

The Soviets were then the leaders in expulsions, either to secure the territory secured under the Nazi-Soviet Pact – Finns, Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians – or as ‘defensive’ measures against ethnic populations potentially aligned with the Germans. The latter involved the Soviets deporting ethnic populations from European Russia to Siberia, Central Asia or more remote areas of the Soviet Union – perhaps most famously the Volga Germans and Crimean Tartars, but also “Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays and Meskehtian Turks”. Many of these were in 1943-1944, arguably  well after the time of any ‘defensive’ emergency had passed.

The United States infamously had its own version of internal deportation with the internment of Japanese-Americans.

Elsewhere the Balkans was the scene of ongoing demographic warfare or outright ethnic cleansing, most well known of which was that of the Serbs from Croatia and Bosnia in Axis-occupied Yugoslavia.

However, one of the largest but still least well known expulsions came at the end and in the aftermath of the Second World War in Europe – the flight and expulsion of Germans from central and eastern Europe, either of Germany minority populations from other countries, now seen as the vanguard or at least casus belli of German aggression against those countries, or Germans from former German territory now ceded to other states, notably East Prussia to the Soviet Union and other eastern German territory to Poland.

“Between 13.5 and 16.5 million German-speakers fled, were evacuated or later expelled from Central and Eastern Europe”. The primary parties responsible for the post-war expulsions were of the new governments of the central or eastern European states formerly occupied by or allied to Germany – and behind them of course Stalin’s Soviet Union – but the western Allies had agreed in principle to such expulsions provided they were carried out in a way that was “orderly and humane”.

Sadly, they were not – with estimates of the number of those who died during or from them ranging from half a million to two or even three million.

While the western Allies played no active part in the post-war expulsion of Germans, except of course to receive them as refugees in their occupation zones in West Germany or Austria, they did notoriously play an active role in the postwar repatriation of Russian Cossacks taken as prisoners of war to a grim fate in the Soviet Union.

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – Mythology: Top 10 Books (Special Mention: Subject) (1) Bible & Biblical Mythology

Harper Perennial edition 1983

 

 

(1) BIBLE & BIBLICAL MYTHOLOGY:

MANFRED BARTHEL – WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY SAYS (1982)

 

Genesis and apocalypse, alpha and omega, allelujah and amen!

Of course, the Bible itself is my primary book on this subject, with it and biblical mythology each in top spot in my Top 10 Mythology Books and Top 10 Mythologies respectively. It’s helped into top spot in that for many people it is not just mythology but religion – hence I take a broad view of this subject to extend to Jewish or Christian folklore such as angels and saints.

The most prominent Biblical figure in my reading – reflecting the prolific number of books on him – would be Jesus, particularly with analysis or studies of what is often termed the historical Jesus (as opposed to the mythic or religious Christ), hence a few of my honorable mentions here. On the other hand, my personal favorite book of the Bible is the Book of Apocalypse, or as I like to call it, Babylon and the Beast – hence my special mention for Jonathan Kirsch, who wrote about it in A History of the End of the World.

It doesn’t stop there. As I like to quip, it’s the book that doesn’t stop giving, even after you stop believing – but also with respect to reading other books, including other entries in my Top 10 Mythology Books or special mentions. Specifically, there’s the aforementioned special mention for Jonathan Kirsch, with his books on biblical subjects other than The Book of Apocalypse – primarily the Old Testament but also manifestations of religious belief within Christianity. More generally, there’s my top ten entries for Barbara Walker’s The Women’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets as well as the Penguin Dictionary of Symbols, each of which has a substantial number of their encyclopedia or dictionary entries on Biblical subjects or broader subjects within Jewish or Christian folklore.

However, the keynote book I’ve selected for this special mention for books on the Bible or biblical mythology is Manfred Barthel’s What the Bible Really Says. The book is summed up in its subtitle, “casting new light on the book of books” – or as per the longer blurb or precis this edition (which is the one I have) has on its front cover for some reason, “fascinating archaeological discoveries and surprising new translations are enriching our understanding of what the Bible really says. Here readers of all religious persuasions will find fresh insights to illuminate and make the Bible more meaningful and exciting reading”.

Given the book was published in 1982, that light is not so new anymore but it remains highly, well, illuminating. I’m not so sure about that “readers of all religious persuasions”, or that “exciting reading” for that matter – as I like to quip, the Bible may be the Word of God but in that case He needed a good editor. Barthel is forthright from the outset that any serious study of the Bible has to abandon any notions of fundamentalism or literalism – that the Bible is literally true in every aspect. However, those inclined to skepticism towards any historicity in the Bible may find their views challenged equally.

What the Bible Really Says is the source of my hot take about the Bible, to antagonize both believers and skeptics – that the Bible is a lot less historical than fundamentalist believers usually maintain, but more historical than skeptics usually give it credit.

Among other things, it proposes more naturalistic explanations of apparently supernatural miracles. For example, it queries that people have proposed all sorts of different explanations, allegorical or otherwise, for the burning bush, until only recently thinking to ask a botanist whether there was a plant capable of matching that description. And indeed there is – a species of plant that accumulates an oil on its leaves, which can then ignite in the sun and burn off, harmlessly without affecting the leaf or plant.

And so on – with little interpretative nuggets like that throughout the book, literally from genesis to apocalypse.

 

RATING: 5 STARS*****

S-TIER (GOD TIER – WHAT ELSE?)

 

Top Tens – TV: Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series (9) Fantasy: House of the Dragon

 

 

(9) FANTASY: HOUSE OF THE DRAGON

(2022 – PRESENT: SEASONS 1-2)

 

For six seasons, Game of Thrones reigned supreme in my Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series, albeit the first four seasons set the gold standard while the fifth and sixth season started to show signs of silver or bronze wearing through.

Then came the seventh season in which it slipped from its supreme reign – but even worse, its eighth and final season, in which it definitely did not stick its Kings Landing, or perhaps, stuck it somewhere winter never comes and painfully at that. I don’t think it’s overstating just how bad this season was to state that it undid all the previous seasons – perhaps not to the point of erasing it from my memory but at least to shuffling it off into my special mentions instead for fond reminiscence of its golden seasons.

And there I thought Westeros and the world of Game of Thrones would remain, to be politely passed over for new fantasy fare.

So imagine my surprise that just when I thought I was out, the prequel series, House of the Dragon – or Hot D for short – pulled me back in. The first season seemed a return to the quality of the early seasons of Game of Thrones – or at least seasons 5-6.

In fairness, quality fantasy fare is hard to come by on screen – which is why my top tens for cinematic or television fantasy & SF is predominated by SF. For some reason – or indeed a number of reasons – directors and producers just seem to adapt SF better than fantasy to the screen, albeit usually with fantastic elements rather cold hard SF.

Also in fairness – once bitten, twice shy. I still have that taste in my mouth from Season 8 of Game of Thrones, particularly as I know that’s how it all ends up, even this prequel series set nearly 200 years earlier – and season 2 showed some signs of sagging or treading water.

But so far so good with that classic Westeros territory – wars of succession and civil wars. Also dragons – only more of them and bigger. And casting an Australian girl as the young Rhaenyra Targaryen, even if they then time jump to another actress for her as one of the two rival claimants for the throne (for the Blacks against the Greens, named for their house colors).

I’m at least in it for the next season.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

The most fantasy of my Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series. No SF to be seen!

 

HORROR

 

Perhaps some elements but not as many as the original Game of Thrones series, with its wights and White Walkers…

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

Top Tens – Film: Top 10 Fantasy & SF Films: (9) SF: Jurassic Park

 

 

(9) SF: JURASSIC PARK

(1993 – yes I know there’s an ongoing franchise but I’m only really counting the first film)

 

Everything’s better with dinosaurs!

We all love dinosaurs, ever since we started digging up their bones – and we particularly love them in cinematic form. I’d argue that there is not one film that would not be improved by a dinosaur (or dinosaurs). Citizen Kane would have been MUCH improved by a dinosaur.

Anyway, Jurassic Park is the pure awesomeness you get when you combine dinosaurs with Steven Spielburg’s mastery of cinematic action and visual effects. Does it need any further introduction? You all know it. You probably can all quote it, from some point or other in the film or franchise.

I actually read the book first. Michael Crichton might have gotten a bit…controversial in his later years, but he sure knew how to craft a story – and Jurassic Park was one of his finest and certainly his most successful. Of course, there are the usual differences between the book and the film – the former had a starring role for the T-Rex’s tongue and the lawyer Gennaro was much more heroic (as lawyers should be), punching out a velociraptor and surviving rather than sniveling in a toilet before being slurped down by the tyrannosaur like the film’s lawyer.

Spielberg’s magic was of course to bring the book to life. The plot is the same – scientists discover how to recreate dinosaurs through a complex cloning process, involving dinosaur blood from mosquitoes fossilized in amber and filling in the gaps with other animal DNA, most notably transsexual frogs. Naturally, they come up with a dinosaur theme park to profit from this discovery, and equally as naturally, everything that can go wrong does go wrong – usually in the form of sharp pointy teeth.

Or in the words of character Dr. Ian Malcolm “Oh yeah, ‘oooh aaah’. That’s how it always starts. Then later, there’s the running and the screaming” – neatly summarizing each of the movies in the series, as TV Tropes pointed out. The same quotation might arguably apply to diminishing returns of the sequels, albeit with marginally less running and screaming. To which I offer the counter-argument – shut up, there’s dinosaurs! Even so, I’ll stick with just the first film for this entry – the franchise has been trying to capture the same magic ever since.

Of course, when it comes to the dinosaurs, there is only one true star. Despite the franchise’s effort to focus on the velociraptors (which I understand they beefed up from their actual and less imposing size of chickens), there’s only one true king (or more precisely, queen) of the prehistoric jungle – the tyrannosaurus rex.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Well, it’s obviously SF – genetically engineered dinosaurs! Although I do like it when dinosaurs pop up in fantasy, which they do surprisingly often. Everything’s better with dinosaurs!

 

HORROR

 

Elements of survival horror from animal predators – the tyrannosaurus rex and velociraptors in particular.

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – History (WW2): Top 10 Second World Wars (Special Mention) (5) Underground War – Partisans, Resistance & Governments-in-Exile

A map showing railroad traffic disruptions in the area of German Army Group Center in the Soviet Union, August 1943 – public domain image of the Historical Division, United States European Military Command (EUCOM), US Army Center of Military History

 

 

(5) UNDERGROUND WAR –

PARTISANS, RESISTANCE & GOVERNMENTS-IN-EXILE

(1931-1945)

 

Special mention has to go to what might be called the underground war – the war of partisans, resistance movements, and governments-in-exile against the Axis powers occupying their nations, primarily Germany but also Italy and Japan (as well as their lesser Axis partners).

Indeed, it is again Japan that is the reason this entry commences in 1931, with the first aggression by any Axis nation (prior to any of the pacts or treaties comprising the Axis from 1936 onwards) with Japan’s invasion and conquest of Manchuria. That saw numerous Chinese insurgents or resistance movements against Japan, as well as resistance movements within Japan itself – although one might identify dissent or resistance against the Japanese imperial government or military well before that in Japan and Korea.

Likewise, German anti-Nazi resistance movements started with the rise of the regime to power in 1933 (and again arguably before that), as did Italian anti-fascist dissent or resistance with the rise of Mussolini to power from 1922 onwards. Of course, the latter became much more substantial as partisans or armed resistance against the Germans (and the German puppet remnants of Mussolini’s government, including Mussolin himself), from 1943 after Italy surrendered to the Allies and the Germans occupied it.

However, the war of partisans, resistance movements, and governments-in-exile against the European Axis powers by the nations they occupied took definitive shape from the Italian conquest of Abyssinia or Ethiopia in 1935 onwards. The primary dichotomy of these combatants was between the communist-led ones, usually preferred by the Soviets, and the various nationalist ones – often resulting in civil war between them.

Most of the entries in my top ten have significant or substantial partisan warfare or armed resistance movements – most notably the Nazi-Soviet war with the partisans on the Soviet side, the partisans or resistance movements within Poland, and the Yugoslavian civil war and war of national liberation, particularly with Tito’s Partisans.

For the most part, partisans and resistance movements lacked significant or substantial military effect or impact, with the primary exceptions being those with the numbers or even more so the terrain for guerilla warfare – most notably in the Soviet Union and the Balkans, but also in Poland, Italy, and the Maquis in France.

That is not to say that partisans or resistance movements lacked any effect or impact where they did not have any such military effect or impact – one could well compile a top ten of forms of resistance, most notably contributions to Allied intelligence.

Even for those partisans or resistance movements that did have a significant or substantial military effect or impact, only those of two nations were able to liberate their nations largely with their own forces – Yugoslavia and Albania, albeit there were also uprisings and partial or temporary liberations achieved by partisans or resistance movements in Poland, France, Greece and Italy. Of course, Yugoslavia and Albania did have outside help, in the form of Soviet operations in the Balkans as well as Allied air support or supplies. They also had the benefit of a combination of terrain and the relative benevolence of Italian occupation, from which they also gained with the withdrawal or even desertion to them of Italian forces after the Italian surrender in 1943. Even with those advantages, they probably still could not have done so without Germany’s defeat by and need to commit forces elsewhere against the Soviets or western allies.

It is also impressive how many occupied nations maintained governments-in-exile, both in the war in Europe and the war against Japan, on both sides but predominantly on the Allied side and in exile in Britain or with British forces. Some of those, such as the governments-in-exile of Abyssinia and Czechoslovakia, predated the German invasion of Poland in 1939.

And it is also impressive just how many of the Allied governments-in-exile made significant or substantial contributions to the Allied war effort despite, you know, losing their nations to occupation.

The Polish government-in-exile, as we’ve seen, commanded Polish armed forces or underground armies that were the fourth largest Allied armed forces in Europe. While the Norwegian government-in-exile commanded more modest armed forces, the Allies gained the services of its merchant navy, the fourth largest in the world and of substantial importance for the Battle of the Atlantic. The Dutch government-in-exile brought with it the forces it had in the Dutch East Indies or Indonesia. The Belgian government-in-exile brought with it the Belgian Congo – and the uranium from there used for the first atomic bombs.

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – Mythology: Top 10 Books (Special Mention: Subject)

Free ‘divine gallery’ sample art from OldWorldGods

 

 

I live in a mythic world.

I don’t have a religion – I have a mythology.

And in both cases, I also have special mentions.

 

That’s right – I don’t just have a top ten mythology books, or my usual twenty special mentions. I have further special mentions by subject – essentially the mythologies or mythological subjects in my top ten mythologies or special mentions. Alternatively, you can look at it as my list of books for further – or classic – reading indexed by mythology or mythological subject.

My usual rule is twenty special mentions for each top ten, if the subject is prolific enough. Here, ironically, it was so prolific I had to condense it to only twenty special mentions, given that I had my top ten mythologies and their twenty special mentions with which to work. Of course, as I usually observe, that would make each top ten a top thirty if you want to look at it that way – or top fifty here as I have two sets of twenty special mentions, one by book and one by subject.

 

Just to remind you, these were my Top 10 Mythology Books (as at 2025):

 

S-TIER (GOD-TIER – OR IS THAT GODDESS TIER?)

(1) BIBLE

(2) HOMER – ILIAD & ODYSSEY

(3) BARBARA WALKER – ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MYTHS & SECRETS

 

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

(4) KATHERINE BRIGGS – DICTIONARY OF FAIRIES

(5) PETER DICKINSON – THE FLIGHT OF DRAGONS

(6) PENGUIN DICTIONARY OF SYMBOLS

(7) WESTON LA BARRE – THE GHOST DANCE

 

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

(8) RONALD HUTTON – THE TRIUMPH OF THE MOON

(9) NATALIE HAYNES – DIVINE MIGHT: GODDESSES IN GREEK MYTH

 

X-TIER (WILD TIER – BEST MYTHOLOGY BOOK OF 2024)

(10) NATALIE LAWRENCE – ENCHANTED CREATURES: OUR MONSTERS & THEIR MEANINGS

 

Top Tens – Tropes & Other: Top 10 Ages (Special Mention)

Wooden hourglass by S Sepp for Wikipedia “Clock” licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

 

TOP 10 AGES (SPECIAL MENTION)

 

I’ve previously compiled my top ten ages – that is, my top ten ages of human history, or rather, the usage of the term age or ages as nomenclature for historical eras (or, in some cases, prehistorical eras – or mythic or scientific eras).

It was not so much ranking them by the quality of each age of itself but the name or title for the age, particularly in terms of resonance or versatility – hence Golden Age, Stone Age, and so on.

However, as usual, I don’t just have a top ten but a whole host of special mentions. My usual rule is twenty special mentions for each top ten, where the subject matter is prolific enough, as it is here – surprisingly so, although I had to push the boundaries of the use of age as nomenclature to include other time periods or titles. After all, my special mentions are also where I can have some fun with the subject category and push some boundaries or splash out with some wilder entries.

 

Geological time scale, proportionally represented as a log-spiral with some major events in Earth’s history by Jarred C Lloyd for Wikipedia “Geologic Time Scale” licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

 

(1) GEOLOGICAL TIME – EON, ERA, PERIOD, EPOCH & AGE

 

We’re talking the big time – or deep time. Time periods so vast that the ages of human history, indeed the entirety of human history or even human prehistory, are blinks of the eye in comparison. Time measured in geological strata. Time based on events throughout the history of the planet itself, a time span of about 4.5 billion years or so.

Eons, eras, periods, epochs, and ages of geological time – enough for their own top ten list, many times over (unless you confined yourself entirely to geological eons, of which there are only four).

Presently we are in the Phanerozoic Eon (over half a billion years), Cenozoic Era (66 million years), Quaternary Period (2.6 million years), Holocene Epoch (11,700 years) (with the informal Anthropocene Epoch often proposed), and Meghalayan Age (4,200 years)

Longest of all, you have eons. These are the big boys of geological time – so big there are only four of them in our planet’s history, spanning from half a billion years to almost two billion years each. Our present eon – the Phanerozoic Eon – is one of the two runts of the litter, just over a half a billion years in length, albeit corresponding to most life on earth (hence its name derived from the Greek for plentiful or abundant life).

Next, you have eras – of which there are ten defined eras, spanning hundreds of millions of years, except for our own current era or Cenozoic Era, the runt of the litter at only 66 million years, commencing with the extinction of the (non-avian) dinosaurs.

Next, periods – of which there are 22 defined periods (and two sub-periods used for the Carboniferous Period), ranging from 20 million to 250 million years, including the big stars of geological time, not least the Jurassic Period thanks to the film franchise of that name. Once again, the runt of the litter – and exception at only 2.6 million years of age (which corresponds to hominid prehistory), is our current period, the Quaternary Period.

Epochs – of which there are 37 formal defined ones (and the informal Anthropocene Epoch named for our environmental impact as well as 11 sub-epochs within our own Quaternary Period and the preceding Neogene Period). Like periods, epochs include some more of the big names of geological time. They mostly come in at 2.5 million years to 42.6 million years – again with our current epoch, the Holocene Epoch, as the exception at only 11,700 years ago, corresponding with the entirety of human history and agricultural prehistory (with change left over from the Stone Age).

Ages are actually the shortest period of geological time, from thousands of years to millions of years, with 96 formal ages and five informal ones. Our current age is the Meghalayan, only four thousand years or so before the present.

 

RATING: S-TIER

GOD-TIER (OR IS THAT EARTH-TIER?)

 

Leonardo Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man – public domain image

 

(2) RENAISSANCE

 

Renaissance has something of the same resonance as golden age, except by way of revival or restoration – the word is literally rebirth in French.

The most famous use of the term is for the Renaissance in Europe, usually connoting the Italian Renaissance in the 15th and 16th century – marking the transition from the medieval period to modernity via the rebirth of classical art, culture and ideas.

One could easily compile a top ten renaissances, indeed even just from its most famous usage alone. While the focus tends to be on the Italian Renaissance to the exclusion of all else, it was part of a wider European cultural movement that was nearly universal throughout Europe – such that the Renaissance can be and is labelled by its national or regional variations, of which the next most famous may well be the English Renaissance, thanks to the Elizabethan era and William Shakespeare representing its peak.

However, the term has been used more broadly than that, including for earlier revivals within the medieval period such as the Carolingian Renaissance, as well as elsewhere in history and culture – essentially for any revival or restoration of former glory or new golden age.

And of course the Renaissance – the famous one – inspired the use of the term Renaissance Man, from such archetypal polymaths such as Leonardo da Vinci.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

(3) ERA

 

The end of an era…

There’s cosmological, geological, calendar, regnal, musical, and above all, historiographical or historical eras.

The last seems to be common usage for eras in American and British history. British historical eras tend to coincide with royal periods – Elizabethan, Victorian, Edwardian, and so on.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

(4) MILLENNIUM

 

That thousand year stare…

Yes, yes – I know the saying is thousand yard stare but I couldn’t resist adapting it for millennium as the period of a thousand years.

Interestingly, Wikipedia lists fifteen millennia BC and three millennia AD in its list of decades, centuries, and millennia – so going all the way back to 15,000 BC, although only the first millennium BC or so is recorded history as such.

Speaking of BC, that prompts the usage of millennium for millenarianism, particularly in Christianity (where it is known as millennialism) – in which millennium connotes return to a golden age (as messianic age)

Millenarianism occurs in some other religions, just not as prevalently, and even in secular movements. Rome celebrated its millennium (from the year of the traditional founding of Rome in 753 BC) – ironically during the Crisis of the Third Century in 248 AD. More infamously, Nazi Germany touted its own millennium for its Third Reich of a thousand years, akin to that for the First Reich or Holy Roman Empire.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

Logo of 20th Century Studios, formerly 20th Century Fox

 

(5) CENTURY

 

Well, this just seemed the natural one to follow after millennium, reflecting our tendency to demarcate history into centuries or periods of a hundred years.

On that point, I’m not sure (and would like to find out) when we began referring to numbered centuries as such in common parlance – at least as commonly as we do to the twentieth or twenty-first century. I suspect people in the nineteenth century referred to it as such but did people do so before then? Say, did people in the fifteenth century refer to themselves as being in the fifteenth century? When did it originate? Obviously, it could not have originated before the concept of the Christian common era – numbering calendar years from the birth of Jesus Christ – which I understand to originate in the sixth century, albeit it would have taken longer to be common parlance (and perhaps the Gregorian calendar).

Another use of century has been to connote predominant world economic or political power. The best known or most famous is probably the American Century, as coined by Time magazine publisher Henry Luce for American predominance in the twentieth century or at least from the middle of it.

However, before that there is Britain’s Imperial Century from 1815 to 1914 as the height of Britain as world power (and empire).

And there has been a number of centuries proposed for the twenty-first century or other successors to the American Century, usually reflecting the resurgence of Asia within the world economy or the rise of China and India – Asian Century, Chinese Century, Indian Century, and Pacific Century.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

(6) DECADE

 

As my entry for century naturally seemed to follow from that for millennium, so too my entry for decade seems to flow naturally from that for century.

Although apparently the contemporary convention of denominating decades by grouping years based on their shared tens digit, that is from a year ending in 0 to a year ending in 9, is just that – contemporary, dating back to the late nineteenth century.

As is the convention of nicknaming decades, such as the Roaring Twenties or the Swinging Sixties.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

(7) PATRIARCHAL AGE

 

All of them, some feminists might quip.

However, the Patriarchal Age usually connotes the (mythic) era of the three Biblical patriarchs in the Book of Genesis – Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

One might well identify the patriarchal age for any nation or phenomenon that asserts a founding father or fathers as being the period contemporary to those father figures.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

(8) HEROIC AGE

 

People mostly remember the “ages of men” in Greek mythology as fourfold – the glittering Golden Age, declining into a still somewhat lustrous Silver Age, before declining further into a war-like Bronze Age and finally rusting into that worst of ages, the Iron Age (the latter two not to be confused with the Bronze Age and Iron Age nomenclature in prehistory).

However, Hesiod who coined these ages of men also included the Heroic Age between the Bronze Age and Iron Age – the time of superhuman heroes from Thebes to Troy that improved upon the preceding Bronze Age (and possibly the Silver Age as well), albeit not quite a return to Golden Age.

Although one might well identify a heroic age for every nation (or even phenomenon) that lays claim to heroes or heroic times. Indeed, there are assertions of British and Germanic Heroic Ages to match the Greek Heroic Age – as well as claims to a Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration and Heroic Age of Medicine.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

 

(9) AXIAL AGE

 

Coined by German philosopher Karl Jaspers, the Axial Age referred to broad but profound changes in philosophical and religious thought that, despite occurring in various locations throughout the ancient world (China, India, Persia, Judaea and Greece), laid “the spiritual foundations of humanity…upon which humanity still subsists today”.

“Jaspers identified a number of key thinkers as having had a profound influence on future philosophies and religions, and identified characteristics common to each area from which those thinkers emerged. Jaspers held up this age as unique and one to which the rest of the history of human thought might be compared”.

Jaspers was talking about the half millennium or so from the 8th century to the 3rd century BC and “presented his first outline of the Axial Age by a series of examples” – Confucius and Lao Tse in China, Buddha in India, Zaruthustra in Persia, the Jewish prophets of the Old Testament, Homer and the Greek philosophers.

It has proved an enduring trope, despite being so broadly drawn as to be somewhat amorphous – one of the major criticisms of it. The other major criticism is that it omits arguably the two most foundational figures in religious thought – Jesus and Mohammed – although presumably Axial Agists would argue that those two figures were influenced by their Axial Age predecessors. One might fix that by proposing a second Axial Age from the birth of Christ through to Mohammed – it certainly is striking that no major world religion of any substance (or at least originality) has arisen after Christianity or Islam.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(10) VIKING AGE

 

The term given to the period in which, not surprisingly given the name, the “Norsemen known as Vikings undertook large-scale raiding, colonising, conquest, and trading throughout Europe and reached North America”.

It is typically used for the period from the first Viking raid in Britain in 793 AD to 1066 AD – the latter for the failed invasion of England attempted by the Norwegian king Harald III rather than the successful Norman conquest that comes to mind for that year (and arguably also falls within the Viking Age).

Some propose a “long Viking Age” stretching as far as the 15th century, given that Norway retained Orkney and Shetland until 1469.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(11) AGE OF DISCOVERY

 

Here be dragons no longer!

Also dubbed the Age of Exploration and largely overlapping with the Age of Sail, typically the period from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries when European nations – primarily Portugal, Spain, France and England – “discovered” the Americas and circumnavigated the world, largely mapping it to our present understanding, at least in the size of oceans and shape of continents (except Australia and Antarctica).

Of course, discovery and exploration continued after the seventeenth century (continuing even now with new ages of space exploration) but perhaps without the same definitive impact as this age, although I remain disappointed that ending the age in the seventeenth century excludes Captain Cook and much of the exploration of Australia.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(12) AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT

 

Also called the Age of Reason or simply the Enlightenment, typically the intellectual and philosophical movement (or movements) in Europe from the late 17th century to the French Revolution or start of the 19th century, although the term itself appears to date from the late 19th century.

Often divided or classified by nation or geography, but particularly into two Enlightenments – the British Enlightenment (extending to the colonies in America) and the continental Enlightenment, the latter usually focused on the French Enlightenment. Think John Locke and Adam Smith for the former – and Voltaire and Rousseau for the latter, although each was far broader than that.

Essentially the origin of modern philosophy and political ideology, overlapping with the scientific revolution – as well as the major impetus for my next entry…

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(13) AGE OF REVOLUTION

 

Following on from the Age of Enlightenment, the period from about 1764 to 1849 – with the revolutionary part commencing with the American and French Revolutions through to 1848 as a year of revolution (also called the Spring of Nations) throughout Europe. Significantly, that includes the Industrial Revolution ongoing throughout the period, which arguably did more than any of the political revolutions to, well, revolutionize the world.

Although come on – it could have extended to the world-shaking Eureka Rebellion in 1854. I suppose at least it included the equally as important Rum Rebellion in 1808 – poor old Captain Bligh kept getting those mutinies.

The term was popularized by communist English historian Eric Hobsbawm as the title of one of his series of histories of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, each with age in the title – albeit from 1789 to 1848 in his title. Despite being communist (and his consequent blind spot towards the flaws of Soviet communism), Hobsbawm had a knack for turns of phrase in his writing – not unlike Marx himself come to think of it. And at least it gave him his perspective of the Industrial Revolution and French Revolution as the two revolutions, economic and political, looming above all others to define modern history – if anything, with the former looming larger.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(14) AGE OF IMPERIALISM

 

The period from 1875 to 1914, according to the title of the book by historian Eric Hobsbawm – as sequel to his Age of Revolution (from 1789 to 1848) and Age of Capital (1848 to 1875).

And in fairness, it’s a pretty good title for that period. While imperialism has been ubiquitous throughout history upon the emergence of states, that period saw imperialism at its largest extent throughout the world, with almost all of it in one empire or another, predominantly those of the European imperial powers of course, but with outliers such as the Ottoman Turks and Japan.

One might well call it the Golden Age of Imperialism (and indeed at least popular historian Paul Johnson did, at least implicitly) – to rival the Golden Age of the Barbarians proposed by James C. Scott in Against the Grain (that extended to about 400 years ago).

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(15) LONG 19TH CENTURY & SHORT 20TH CENTURY

 

The long 19th century – from 1789 to 1914 (or the French Revolution to the First World War) – a concept popularized by English historian Eric Hobsbawm (but not originating from him).

It essentially reflects that the historical momentum of a period connoted by a century may not fit neatly within the tidy nomenclature of years numbered from 00 to 99. It’s a concept that has been applied to other centuries as well – the long sixteenth century proposed by French historian Fernand Braudel (from 1450 to 1640), as well as similar proposals for the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Not surprisingly, given what some historians have noted as the acceleration of historical momentum or change in modern history, the twentieth century gets the reverse treatment with the concept of the short twentieth century, which Hobsbawm also adopted – typically from 1914 to 1991 or from the First World War to the end of the Cold War (the Long War popularized by Philip Bobbitt).

Speaking of war as well as those two centuries, I can’t resist throwing in the seemingly paradoxical observation by historian H.P. Willmott that the Second World War was the last war of the nineteenth century, while the First World War was the first war of the twentieth century.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

(16) KALI YUGA

 

And we round out my special mentions for Top 10 Ages with some wild-tier mythic or mystical ages, starting with one of the biggest – the Kali Yuga, named for the Hindu goddess of destruction.

It’s “the fourth, shortest and worst of the four yugas (world ages) in Hinduism”, similar to the Iron Age of classical mythology, although given the cyclical nature of Hinduism, it is immediately followed by the first age of the next cycle.

Naturally people identify the worst of world ages with our own present age.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

 

(17) FIVE SUNS

 

The five distinct cycles or world-ages of creation and destruction in Aztec mythology, with ours being the fifth.

Being Aztec mythology, they all kind of suck, each with their own apocalyptic destruction – particularly now that we aren’t feeding the sun god with blood sacrifices…

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

 

(18) AGE OF AQUARIUS

 

“This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius!

Age of Aquarius!

Aquarius!

Aquarius!”

 

Yes – that’s from the 1967 musical Hair and is about as trippy, hippy, New Age mysticism as it sounds.

The song is catchy though – even if I can’t now get out of my head the cheeky adaptation of it in the Illuminatus trilogy

 

“This is the dawning of the Age of Bavaria!

Age of Bavaria!

Bavaria!

Bavaria!”

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

 

 

The Downfall of Numenor and the Changing of the World (from Second to Third Age) – Ian Alexander based on Tom Shippey, The Road to Middle-Earth, for Wikipedia “History of Arda” licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

 

(19) FOUR AGES OF MIDDLE-EARTH

 

Yes – I know it’s not real world history but Tolkien did intend it as mythology for England and I just can’t resist including the ages of Tolkien’s Middle-Earth as special mentions for my Top 10 Ages.

Of course, fans are most familiar with the Third Age, as the setting for The Hobbit and The Lord of the Ring – even almost all the backstory in the appendices of the latter. It’s over three thousand years long, with the main events of book books within the last century or so.

The Second Age was the period of almost three and a half millennia before the Third Age, ending with the defeat of Sauron (and his loss of the Ring) by the Last Alliance of Men and Elves. Of course, the only thing more destructive to the Second Age than Sauron was its desecration by The Rings of Power.

The First Age was the most cosmic of Middle Earth’s ages, with its most prominent feature as the war against the uber-Sauron, Morgoth.

The Fourth Age is essentially everything as epilogue (literally in the appendices) to the destruction of the Ring and final defeat of Sauron, although it was nice enough to wait until Sam got home from seeing off Frodo at the Grey Havens before starting.

The Fourth Age then merged with the ages of our own history – so that there would indeed be a Fifth and Sixth Age or even more – as apparently 6,000 years or so before the twentieth century.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

 

Romans during the Decadence by Thomas Couture, 1847 – public domain image

 

(20)  AGE OF DECADENCE

 

It is one of my rules in my top tens to throw in a kinky entry amidst my wilder special mentions, usually as my final or twentieth special mention, at least where the subject matter permits. So I’m going with age of decadence here. If it’s decadent enough, it might skip the age and simply be known as decadence or the decadence.

And yes – it may be the title of a video game but the term decadence “implies moral censure, or an acceptance of the idea, met with throughout the world since ancient times…declines are objectively observable and that they inevitably precede the destruction of the society in question”.

It does not necessarily connote moral or s€xual decadence or degeneration, as it may connote other forms of decline, but let’s face it – it usually does (or at least there’s an overlap).

The people who tend to decry decadence often tend to do so in contemporary terms – that is, they tend to see themselves in an age of decadence, leading inevitably through decline to destruction, albeit they also tend to see themselves as aloof from any of it.  In other words, declinism – “the idea that a society or institution is declining is called declinism”.

Typical ages of decadence in history are like those attributed to the Roman Empire before its fall – reveling in luxury, in its extreme characterized by corrupting “extravagance, weakness, and s€xual deviance”, as well as “orgies and sensual excesses”.

The concept of decadence also lent itself to a late-19th-century movement in art, culture and literature – “emphasizing the need for sensationalism, egocentricity, and bizarre, artificial, perverse, and exotic sensations and experiences”.

In his book, From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, historian Jacques Barzun gave a more useful definition of decadence without moral judgement – not as a slur but as a technical label – albeit seemingly evoking The Second Coming by William Butler Yeats: “The forms of art as of life seem exhausted, the stages of development have been run through. Institutions function painfully.”

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

TOP 10 AGES (SPECIAL MENTION):

TIER LIST

S-TIER (GOD TIER – OR IS THAT EARTH TIER?)

(1) GEOLOGICAL TIME – EON, ERA, PERIOD, EPOCH & AGE

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

(2) RENAISSANCE

(3) ERA

(4) MILLENNIUM

(5) CENTURY

(6) DECADE

(7) PATRIARCHAL AGE

(8) HEROIC AGE

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

(9) AXIAL AGE

(10) VIKING AGE

(11) AGE OF DISCOVERY

(12) AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT

(13) AGE OF REVOLUTION

(14) AGE OF IMPERIALISM

(15) SHORT 19TH CENTURY & LONG 20TH CENTURY

X-TIER (WILD TIER)

(16) KALI YUGA

(17) FIVE SUNS

(18) AGE OF AQUARIUS

(19) FOUR AGES OF MIDDLE EARTH

(20) AGE OF DECADENCE

 

Top Tens – TV: Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series: (10) SF: Fallout

Amazon Prime promotional poster art for Fallout

 

(10) SF: FALLOUT

(2024: SEASON 1)

 

Yes, I’m running with this series and its 2024 debut on Amazon Prime as my wildcard tenth place entry as best of 2024.

For one thing, there wasn’t much else I saw by way of debut fantasy or SF TV series to outrank it in 2024. For another, as flawed as it was, it was fun, even if that fun was carried by its lead Ella Purnell (who, as voice actress for Jinx in Netflix’s Arcane really seems to be having a banger year or years recently on television) as well as the always reliable Walter Goggins as the Ghoul (also having a banger year or so in television as voice actor for Cecil in Prime’s Invincible). The two of them pairing up was the highlight of the series.

Yes, it’s cheesy, but then so are the games from which it is adapted and you could hardly expect high art from it. It’s your standard post-apocalyptic wasteland, albeit from nuclear war between the United States and China in an alternative twenty-first century with retro-futuristic 50s chic.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Classic post-apocalyptic SF – after a nuclear war in an alternate history timeline to boot. Of course, post-apocalyptic SF can often have elements of fantasy

 

HORROR

 

And more often, elements of horror – as here, notably with the ghouls.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

X-TIER (WILD TIER) – BEST OF 2024